Egyptian Dreams II

For people who really DIG Ancient Egypt!
HomeHome  PortalPortal  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 

 All Pyramids Are Not Egyptian

Go down 

Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-12-18
Age : 60
Location : Alexandria---Arsinoea Sarione Ptolemy

PostSubject: All Pyramids Are Not Egyptian   Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:07 pm

Pyramids, Platforms, Dolmens and Mounds

As is well known there are literally hundreds of pyramids of various styles
scattered over the Earth, in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Far East,
Southeast Asia and South Pacific, and in North and South America. A few of these
sites demonstrating the different styles are:

  • Iraq: The reconstructed ziggurat-pyramid at Ur, in ancient
  • Egypt: The step pyramid at Saqqara.
  • Egypt: The smooth-walled pyramids at Giza. Hancock and Bauval (1996)
    suggest that the ‘ground plan’ of the three great pyramids was physically
    established in 10,500 bc, but that the pyramids were built around 2,500 bc. This
    supports the notion that the pyramid base rock with its underground chamber was
    an early AA terminal, and the Sphinx was the associated landmark easily
    identified from space.
  • Mexico: The highly decorated step pyramids at Chichen-Itza, Monte Alban,
    and elsewhere. In the Temple of Inscriptions at Palenque, a shaft runs from the
    tomb up to the temple floor, similar to some of the Egyptian pyramids. There was
    initially a 40 ft "comb" on the top. Was this an additional
    identifying marker?
  • Mexico: The unusual elliptical pyramid at Uxmal.
  • Mexico: The huge, unexcavated pyramid at Cholula (Fig 4-1), in the shadow
    of the volcano, Popocatepetl ("El Popo"). Its ancient name,
    Tlachihualtepetl, means "man-made mountain". On Quetzalcoatl’s
    pilgrimage his first stop was Cholula, which means ‘the place of flight’
    in Nahuatl. The huge "Piramide Tepanapa", 200 ft high and 1300 ft on a
    side, is the largest ancient pyramid in the Americas, and possibly the largest
    in the world. The earliest construction has been traced to 200 bc. It was
    covered with dirt to hide it from the invading Spaniards and a small shrine was
    placed at the top, which the Spanish replaced with a church (Fig 4-1). The small
    portion which has been excavated reveals remarkable masonry (Fig 4-2).

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber2" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="369">
<td width="157">

Fig 4-1</td>
<td width="212">

Fig 4-2

  • Mexico: Tres Zapotes, an Olmec site (1300 – 400 bc), was the first
    adobe-brick pyramid site in Mesoamerica. (Mystery buffs please note: Before the
    arrival of Cortez ALL of the Olmec sites were destroyed, except El Tijin, which
    had been abandoned!)
  • Mexico: The truncated cone pyramid of Cuicuilco. In 1917 Manuel
    excavating off the road from Mexico City to Cuernavaca, found an overgrown hill
    called ‘Cuicuilco’ enveloped by pre-historic lava streams. It turned out to
    be an enormous ancient pyramid or truncated cone with four galleries and central
    staircase. It is one of the few remaining round stepped pyramids. The base is
    370 ft and it is about 60 ft high now, although it was originally much higher.
    Archeologist Paul Heinrich reports the age to be 800 to 600 bc, not 6000 bc as
    reported by others. (Miller, 2000)

  • Mexico: The beautiful miniature pyramid at Cecilia, D.F.

  • Mexico: The platform-pyramids at Teotenango, Tenayaca, and

  • Mexico: The multi-platform style of the Pyramid of the Sun,
    Teotihuacan. In
    his discussion of Teotihuacan, John Michel (1995) quotes another researcher:
    "During the 1970s Hugh Harleston, Jr …established that ‘the basic unit
    of measurement at Teotihuacan was 1.0594 meters, the same unit which represents
    the ‘Jewish rod’ of 3.4757 ft., the same unit which represents the width of
    the Stonehenge lintels, a six-millionth part of the earth’s polar radius…’"

  • Guatemala: The huge pre-classic (150 bc-150 ad) Mayan site of El Mirador
    with its dozens of pyramids, including the Tigre Pyramid rising 18 stories high,
    probably the largest pyramid ever built by the Maya.

  • Peru: Moche Temple of the Sun. The earlier Moche built this temple-pyramid
    style pyramid from 140 million adobe bricks.

  • Peru: Sipan Pyramid. This Moche pyramid-tomb near the town of Sipan proves
    that some of the early SA pyramids were tombs, as in Egypt and Mesoamerica.

  • Peru: Pyramids of Cahuachi. A ceremonial site comprised of six pyramids,
    the highest being about 70 ft, overlooking a walled court of 4050 sq yards.
    (Morrison, 1988). Hadingham (1987) mentions that the "great temple"
    was a stepped pyramid. He quotes Helaine Silverman’s estimate that the period
    of most activity at Cahuachi was short lived, about 200 years, and the site was
    mysteriously abandoned around 200 ad, along with other several other important

  • Peru: The pyramids of Tucume. "Covering over 540 acres and including
    26 major pyramids as well as myriad smaller structures…first built around 1100
    ad by people of the Lambayeque culture…" The largest of the adobe brick
    pyramids, Huaca Larga, is 2300 ft long, 910 ft wide and 65 ft high. (Heyerdahl,
    1995). Robert Schoch (1999) writes, "The largest of the pyramids, called
    Tucume…was only a little over 200 feet high, but it contained one-third more
    volume that the Pyramid of Khufu at Giza."

  • Peru: Huaca del Sol, Moche Valley. This is a 120 ft high pyramid on the
    Peruvian north coast. The 1.5 million mud brick pyramid is the largest man-made
    mound in SA. Facing Huaca del Sol across the main plaza was a smaller mound,
    Huaca del Luna. The site lies at the foot of Cerro Blanco, an obvious landmark
    from space for this ceremonial/feeding center (Hadingham, 1987)

  • Bolivia: The Akapana platform-pyramid at Tiahuanaco. The Bolivian
    archaeologists date the site to 1580 bc. The Akapana measures 688 ft on a side
    and is 49 ft high. "The earthen interior was shaped like a stepped pyramid
    and faced with fitted stones." (Demetrio, 1983)

  • Java: Cani Sukuh pyramid, resembling the Mexico pyramid style (Childress,
    1996). Who carried this style across the Pacific?

  • Ryukyu Islands: The Yonaguni underwater pyramid. This unique
    step-pyramid-platform, 240 ft long and 90 ft high, resting 75 ft underwater, has
    been dated to 8000 bc! (Dopatka, 2000)

  • China: The White Pyramid, near Xi’an. Hartwig Hausdorf (1998) says there
    are 90-100 pyramids in China, near Xi’an, the tallest being about 200 ft. Xi’an
    incidentally is the site of the amazing ‘Terracotta Army’ of Qin Shi Huang.

  • Polynesia: "modest pyramids" at Tongatabu; a temple-pyramid on
    Tahiti; the Langi stepped pyramid-platform at Tauhala (a large stone, 24 x 7 ft
    and weighing 30-40 tons, is in the wall).

  • Ancient pyramids are also found on Samoa and Java. (Childress, 1996)

  • Greece: Pyramid of Hellinikon, near Argos. The author writes, "…built
    in the style reminiscent of cyclopean walls…" Its base is 15 x 13 meters,
    and the tallest wall still standing it only 14 ft. From the photos it probably
    would have stood about 10 meters high when completed. Thermoluminescent analysis
    of the pyramid in 1997 yielded a construction date of 2720 bc, older than the
    archeologists state for the Cheops pyramid! (Tsoukalow, 2000)

  • Canary Islands: The pyramids of Guimar. Thor Heyerdahl writes, "…They
    were painstakingly built step-pyramids, constructed according to similar
    principles as those of Mexico, Peru, and ancient Mesopotamia."

  • United States: Monk’s pyramid-mound at Cahokia, Illinois, a mud brick
    platform-pyramid. A large stone wall or room has recently been discovered inside
    the mound, but has not been excavated as of Oct 2000.

  • Yonaguni: Situated between the East China Sea and the
    Philippine Sea, about 300 miles from Okinawa, is the island of Yonaguni-Jima.
    Off it's coast is a huge apparently manmade (god-made?) monument about 100 ft
    below the surface. Its a platform pyramid 600 ft wide, 90 ft high constructed of
    precisely hewn megalithic stones. The pyramid, apparently a part of a ceremonial
    center, has been dated to 8000 bc, 5000 years before the oldest pyramid in


The best clue we have that the gods orchestrated the pyramid building is the
tale of Gudea who built the temple-ziggurat at Lagash (apparently the god
was the only one authorized to design the temples. He was likely
the same "Greek divine craftsman Hepahaestus" who built the
temple-abode of Zeus, and the Egyptian god Thoth). For Ninurta’s temple at
Lagash Gudea was given elaborate and continuous instructions by the gods. He
built a seven-tier ziggurat, named Eninnu, referring to a ingenious tablet which
gave a plan view and 7 scales – one for each tier (Zecharia Sitchin describes
this story in detail in his 1976 and 1993 books. See also figs 748, 749 of
Pritchard, 1969).
Zecharia Sitchin makes an interesting connection with his statement that the
three great pyramids of Giza are at 52 degree, but the later pyramids collapsed
at this angle and were built at 43.5 degrees, and he maintains that the pyramids
at Teotihuacan are also at 43.5 degrees. Furthermore "although the 2nd
pyramid at Giza is shorter than the Great Pyramid, their peaks are at the same
height above sea level because the 2nd one is built on higher ground; the same
holds true at Teotihuacan where the smaller Pyramid of the Moon is built on
ground some thirty feet higher than the Sun Pyramid, giving their peaks equal
height above sea level." We should note here also that both the Great
Pyramid at Giza and the Sun Pyramid at Teotihuacan have a descending shaft
burrowed into the bedrock on which the pyramids were built.
One of the problems in choosing a landing site for a vertical-lift aircraft
is the dust and dirt generated by the exhaust. Before pyramids were built this
problem was apparently minimized by landing on large rock outcrops.
The problem
is better solved however by landing on step pyramids, or step platforms, since
the tiers at each level would effectively deflect the exhaust (Fig 4-3).

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber3" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<td align="center" valign="top" width="50%">

Fig 4-3
Deflection of rocket exhaust
by stepped pyramid design</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" width="50%">

Fig 4-4
Zoser pyramid in Egypt</td>

ziggurats at Urand Babylon, the Zoser pyramid in Egypt (Fig 4-4), the Canary Island
pyramids, and most of the Mexican pyramids and South American pyramids, employed
this design.
Interestingly some of the Egyptian pyramids have multiple chambers which seem
to have been built over periods of time, e.g. Sneferu’s pyramid has an
underground chamber, a 2nd chamber near the surface, and a 3rd chamber up in the
pyramid, as if the site was in use before, possibly long before, the pyramid was
erected, probably as a landing and feeding site. The chambers of the Great
Pyramid also follow this pattern; the 1st one being deep underground, then the
2nd (‘Queens’) chamber built low in the center of the pyramid, and the 3rd (‘Kings’)
chamber higher up. This pattern suggests that one goal was to provide continuous
and increasing degrees of protection from above.
The pyramids of Mycerinus, Unas, Teti and most others also had underground
chambers. In fact the pyramids of Mycerinus and some others did not even have
chambers in the pyramids themselves - all chambers were underground! Obviously
this design would make excellent bomb shelters, and I suspect that the large
pyramids, and any hapless occupants, if they had been located at "ground
zero" at Hiroshima or Nagasaki, would have survived. The pyramidal shape
would have effectively deflected most of the blast wave and fireball, and the
neutron and gamma-ray pulses would have been attenuated to negligible levels by
the stone mass.
Zecharia Sitchin (1985) offers a rather fantastic function for the pyramids
of Giza: that they were built by the Nefilim, not by mankind, as part of a
guidance grid for "the Tilmun spaceport". He develops a theory that
ties the pyramids and the "sacred cities" into a guidance and
communication grid for two approach corridors, one west-to-east over Mesopotamia
and one west-to-east over the Sinai. "Built by the gods (Anunnaki), they
were landmarks and beacons for the spaceport in Sinai, and existed long before
kingship began in Egypt.
" The great pyramid was "…the mountain by
which Utu ascends…".
Regarding the Giza pyramids some scholars argue that the stones were
pulled up long ramps on sleds, referencing the familiar painting from
the tomb of Djehutihotepe of 204 workers moving his 60 ton statute on a
(Fig 4-5). But this only proves that this statue was moved on a sled. I
am not
aware of a single image or inscription which depict the methods used to
construct the great pyramids. We simply do not know how it was done.

Fig 4-5

Incidentally Mark and Richard Wells (2000) have discovered an amazing
similarity in the alignment and size of the three stars in Orion's belt and the
alignment and size of the major pyramids at Giza, Egypt; Xi'an, China;
Teotihuacan, Mexico. Don't miss their essay.
So we have pyramids of heights ranging from 30 ft to over 400 ft, lengths
from 100 ft to 2300 ft; some with inner chambers and some solid throughout;
stepped and smooth walled; square, round and elliptical bases; stone, mud and
adobe brick construction; highly decorated or plain; some topped with small
From these various styles, sizes, and composition I think we can conclude
that the pyramids had several functions: burial sites, landmarks, landing sites,
feeding stations, bomb shelters, and ceremonial sites; and there is evidence
that many of them served several functions simultaneously. But one thing seems
certain – the pyramids, platforms and mounds around the world were places
where the gods and mankind came together.

The Megalith Builders

Yahweh questions Job:

“Let me ask thee, and answer thou me: Where wast
thou, when the Earth’s foundation I laid out? Say, if thou knowest science:
Who hath measured it, that it be known? Or who hath stretched a cord upon it? By
what were its platforms wrought? (my emphasis) Who hath cast its Stone of

(Job 38:3-8 as translated by Sitchin, 1998)

The literature contains many references to the enormous hewn stones
were used in ancient construction around the world, a few of which are as
follows (See also Cohane, 1977, chapter 12):

  • Egypt, The Great Pyramid of Cheops: “…consists of 2.5 million stones 1
    to 40 tons each. It takes a 300 hp diesel engine and hydraulic lifter to pick up
    a 7 ton granite slab”.
  • “The biggest blocks at Giza weighed 200 tons. The biggest blocks at
    Tiahuanaco weighed 400 tons…

  • Egypt, Zoser pyramid complex: “Mummified bulls were
    found in stone coffins weighing 80 tons.”

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber4" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<td valign="top" width="78%">

  • Egypt, Aswan quarry: “The ‘Unfinished Obelisk’ near Aswan still lies
    in its quarry, detached on all but its lower side. If it had been extracted, it
    would have been 41.75 meters (137 ft) high with a base about 4.2 meters on each
    side. The total weight would have been about 1168 tons, heavier than any piece
    of stone ever handled by the ancient Egyptians”.
  • Egypt, Temple of Hatshepsut at Karnak: “…one of the largest standing
    obelisks remaining at Karnak. It is 29.5 meters (96.7 ft) high and weighs 323
  • Egypt, Karnak: “The seventh and last of the Karnak obelisks…is the
    largest surviving obelisk, with a height of 36 meters.” This 118 ft obelisk
    was removed to Rome in antiquity and now stands in the Piazza San Giovanni in
    Laterano. It was shortened to 32 meters (105 ft) when it was re-erected in the
    sixteenth century, and its current weight is 455 tons.” (Fig 5-2).

<td valign="top" width="22%">

Fig 5-2
Obelisk at Karnak</td>

  • Egypt, Luxor: “Ramesses II placed two obelisks before the Luxor Temple,
    only one of which remains, the other was taken to Paris. The Luxor obelisk is
    made of red granite; it is 25 meters (82 ft) high and weighs 254 tons.”

  • Bolivia, Tiahuanaco and Puma-Punku: “…stones weigh up to 400 tons…”
    “…stones up to 100 tons each, were quarried 10 kilometers away.”
    “One block of red sandstone in the platform of the Puma Punku weighs 131
    tons. It had been hauled 10 kilometers.”

  • England, Stonehenge: “…160 stones, 4-37 tons each.” “The ‘sarsen’
    stones were moved 20 miles from Avebury, some weighing 30 tons and standing 30
    ft high.”

  • England, Avebury: “There were two hundred or so stones in the circles,
    the largest of which were over 55 tons, to be dragged a mile or more from the

  • Ireland, Dublin: “…The capstone of the megalithic tomb at Brenanstown, weighing
    approximately 67 tons.”

  • Mexico, La Venta: “…some of the (Olmec) stone “portrait” heads weighing as much as 25
    tons.” “Stones weighing as much as 30 tons were found at Mitla.”

  • Mexico, Quirigua: “…the largest Mayan stele, at Quirigua, measuring 10.7 x 1.5 x 1.27
    meters, and weighing 65 tons.” “the site of Quirigua is where the largest monolith in the Maya world
    stands. It is the Stella E, weighing 65 tons and standing 35 feet high. It was
    quarried about three miles away.”

  • Peru, Sacsahuaman: “…a stone 27 ft high and weighing over 300 tons.”

  • Peru, Ollantaytambo: Regarding the six colossal monoliths at Ollantaytambo, “The gigantic stone
    blocks are from eleven to almost fourteen feet high, average six or more feet in
    width, and vary in thickness from about three to over six feet.” “…some
    weighing up to 250 tons.” “…the giant stone blocks were quarried on the
    mountain on the opposite side of the valley. The heavy blocks of red granite,
    after they had been quarried, hewed, and shaped, were then transported from the
    mountainside, across two streams, and up to the Ollantaytambo site, carefully
    raised, put precisely in place, and finally fused together.” (Sitchin, 1990).
    (Notice the phrase "fused together".)

  • Lebanon, Baalbek: “…the colossal stones, the Trilithon, each weighs about 1100 tons; it is
    a weight no modern piece of equipment can even come close to lifting and moving.”
    (Fig 5-3). “None of today’s machines could move these megaliths. The largest block
    is 21 x 4 x 4 meters and the two others are 19.50 x 4 x 4 meters. Together they
    are 60 meter in length and 960 cu meters in volume. The blocks were quarried 400
    meters distant."

Fig 5-3
Trilithon at Baalbek

“The first of these blocks to the right (the Trilithon) measures 65’ in
length, the second 64’10”, the third 63’2”. They were all 14’ 6 in
height and 12’ in thickness”.

“…the stone in the quarry, Hajar-el-Hibla ("stone of the pregnant
woman") is 69’ long, 16’ wide, and 13’10” high…this enormous
stone weighs about 1000 tons” (Fig 5-4). Apparently this is the largest
construction stone in the world. Click here for excellent photos of the Baalbek

Fig 5-4. Hajar-el-Hibla at Baalbek

  • Israel, Jerusalem, The Temple Mount: “The stones were cut with such precision that no mortar was needed to fit
    them together. Some of these ashlars (columns) are as much as 35 feet long and
    weigh up to 70 tons.” “The Royal Stoa at the southern end of the mount was built in the shape of
    a basilica with four rows of 40 columns each, each 50 feet high…would weigh
    about 85 tons each.” “about 60 feet north of Wilson’s Arch…there are four blocks 11 feet
    high, one of which is 42 feet long and 14 feet thick, giving an estimated weight
    of 1,200,000 pounds…”
  • France, Carnac: “…the 650 foot ‘long mound’ (Er-Grah), and its relationship to the
    Grand Menhir monolith, 65 feet tall and weighing 350 tons (now fallen)…”
  • Malta: “At Tarxien there are three temples and one Hal-Saflieni, a rock-cut
    hypogeum. The temples incorporate stone blocks weighing up to 24 tons each.”
  • Greece, Mycenae, the ‘Treasury of Atreus’: “One or the lintels over the entrance door measures 9x5x1.2, with an
    estimated weight of 120 tons.”
    “…it is roofed by two enormous slabs, beautifully cut and polished, of
    which the inner one measure 3’9” in thickness, and 27.5’ in length on its
    lower and 29’ on its upper surface; its breadth is 17’, and it is computed
    that it weighs approximately 300,000 English pounds.”
  • Easter Island, Rapa Nui: Of the 300 standing statues the highest is 65 ft;
    of the 200 unfinished statues in the quarry, one would have been 164 ft high.

Today, with high strength steel, we are able to move heavy objects on steel
wheels, e.g. a 200 ton autoclave was moved 750 miles over US western roads on a
rig having 112 wheels and powered by two large diesel tractors. However some
things are too big to be moved on wheels, and instead steel rollers are used.
The 198-foot-high Cape Hatteras Lighthouse was moved about a half mile during
1999. It weights well over 1000 tons. To move the lighthouse a compacted gravel
road was built, on which large steel plates were placed. Steel rails were then
set on the road plates in the direction of the move. To accomplish the move
steel roller “dollies” were placed on the rails and were driven by powerful
hydraulic rams. A total of 400 tons of steel was used directly under the light
for support. The light would be moved a few feet and then the plates and rails
behind it would be unbolted and moved to the front.
Kiloton objects can also be moved on “tank tracks” which are essentially
steel rollers running on steel tracks.
Also steel cranes have been built which can lift several hundred tons. A New
York engineering corporation has a huge hydraulic crane which can lift 500 tons,
which is used to lift smaller cranes to the tops of buildings under
construction. NASA constructed a crane having a lifting capacity of 430 tons,
which is used to lift the shuttle during attachment to the fuel tanks.
Its been suggested that the huge stones in place at ancient megalithic sites
were moved around on wooden rollers. I think these authors are not aware of the
relative strength of wood and steel. While a steel T-beam, mounted vertically
with both ends fixed, can support a load of about 100 tons, a 10 inch diameter
wood beam of the same length can only support about 10 tons. And if the wood
beam is laid down so that the load is cross-grain rather than end-on, it will
splinter under a much smaller load. Furthermore even if they don't splinter they
will deform under the load and will slide instead of roll; this happened when 20
people tried to move a replica of one of the statues on Easter Island, and it
only weighed 9 tons! So can we really imagine a group of prehistoric people
sliding the 1000 ton blocks at Baalbek? Some Egyptologists suggest that the huge
obelisks were moved on wooden rollers but not a single one has ever been found.
Clearly it’s just nonsense to maintain that these stones were moved on wooden
So, when we consider the kiloton stones used at ancient megalithic sites,
especially the monsters at Baalbek, I see three possibilities:
The first is that a technology comparable to our own existed at that time,
employing high strength metal alloys, hydraulics and powerful engines. However,
such a technology would involve the use of many materials, including gold and
ceramics, which would last many millennia, and I am not aware of any reports of
discoveries of any such artifacts. Additionally, since this technology existed
all over the Earth, this possibility requires the difficult assumption that the
members of this entire civilization disappeared, or at least “forgot” the
technology, at about the same time, or in a worldwide conspiracy, disposed of
all of the tools. This scenario seems highly unlikely.
There are a few references to a second possibility which take us into the psi
world - that the stones were moved by beings having the ability to control the
local gravitational field:

  • Giza, Egypt: “Then said Pharaoh, ‘Where lies the papyrus on which
    Imhotep wrote the words of power that went to the building of the pyramid for
    Zoser, yes and for that of Seneferu my father also…The words of power can be
    found and spoken by none but he-and if he speaks them three great pyramids shall
    rise at Giza and stand there forever. But if he speaks them not, all that you
    build, and your son builds and your son’s son after him shall fall and crumble
    away and become as the sands of the desert.’”(Green, 1967). At his "Giza
    Oracle" site Patrick Cooke presents a compelling argument that the Great
    Pyramid was not built by ancient Egyptians.
  • Uxmal, Mexico: “…construction work was easy for them…all they had to
    do was whistle and the heavy rocks would move into place.”
  • Tiahuanaco, Bolivia: “…(the stones were) carried through the air to the
    sound of a trumpet”.
  • Giza, Egypt: “…a magician was said to have raised into the air a huge
    vault of stone 200 cubits long and 50 cubits broad”. (Hancock, 1995).

However with our current level of technology, ideas concerning anti-gravity
and levitation take us into the realm of the supernatural, and so are
out-of-bounds in these pages.
The third possibility is that aircraft and cables were available at that time
which had the power and strength to lift and move the stones.
Of course we do not know for sure how these incredibly heavy stones were
quarried, moved, and assembled, and short of a revelation, will likely never
know. But we do know that even the heaviest construction today is not done with
kiloton stones; it’s difficult, slow and expensive. Logically the only reason
for the ancients to build with such huge stones is because it was easy for them
to do so.
Consider Baalbek in Lebanon where we find a huge platform which underlies,
and predates, the ruins of the magnificent Roman temple of Jupiter. It contains
the largest stones ever used in construction. How was it built? And by whom?
Here are some clues:
- Michel Alouf (1999) discusses the many theories concerning the builders of
the pre-roman portions of the site. He came to the conclusion that it was the
temple Baalath built by Solomon, based on the following biblical passage (I
Kings, IX; 17-19):

“And Solomon built Gezer and Beth-Horon, the lower, and Baalath and Tadmor
(Palmyra) in the wilderness, in the land, and all the cities of store that
Solomon had, and cities for his chariots, and cities for his horsemen, and that
which Solomon desired to build in Jerusalem, and in Lebanon, and in all the land
of his dominion.”
- Childress (2000) mentions the Kebra Negast, the spiritual guide of the
Ethiopians, which says that Solomon had a flying vehicle; also that there are
hilltops in Pakistan and Iran where Solomon is believed to have landed.
- By the tradition of the ancient Jews, Jehovah was not the only god in the
universe, he was the “only god of this particular people”; and although by
the act of the covenant the Israelites had committed themselves to the rule of
Jehovah’s law, King Solomon (950 bc) had permitted the worship, apparently
even in Jerusalem, of a rival god, Baal, whose main temple was at Baalbek (Baalath).
- Near the Golden Gate (Jerusalem) is a small mosque, the “Kurst Suleiman”.
Here legend tells us that, “King Solomon sat watching the Jann and Genii
laboring to build his great monuments in Jerusalem, Baalbek, and Palmyra.”
(Cornfeld,1972) (Jann were a type of Persian Genii, or "Genius", who
had the annoying habit of stealing cows – to eat, I suppose).

- Throughout the ancient Near East we find images of one or more people
flying in “winged discs”. And we find “genie”, also called “bird-men”
by scholars, who are represented as powerful humans with wings (Fig 5-5), and
sometimes with the face of an Eagle, and called "eagle-men". Virginia
Marin ( writes that Genie, or geniuses, were “…all-powerful.
They had great natural and inventive ability. They were smart and possessed
great mental capacity…”

Fig 5-5

I conclude this page by speculating that the stones were moved by being
suspended from powerful aircraft operated by the AA “geniuses”.

Puedo estar loco, but the stones are there !

Master Masons

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber5" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<td valign="top" width="33%"></td>
<td valign="top" width="67%">
Yahweh questions Job:

“Let me ask thee, and answer thou me: Where wast thou, when the Earth’s foundation I laid out?
Say, if thou knowest science: Who hath measured it, that it be known? Or who hath stretched a cord upon it?
By what were its platforms wrought? Who hath cast its Stone of Corners?” (my emphasis)

(Job 38:3-8 as translated by Sitchin, 1998)

A unique characteristic of many of the megalithic sites is the polygonal
stones which were used, the “Stone of Corners”. At Sacsahuaman, above Cuzco,
Peru there is the stone of Hatun Rumiyoc, a huge polygonal stone with 12
corners, which interlocks perfectly with adjacent stones. Polygonal stonework
was used at several sites in Peru (Figs 6-1,2 ), Greece (Fig 6-3), Lebanon (Fig
6-4), Turkey, Egypt and Bolivia, and Easter Island, among others. Also near the
base of the Cheops Pyramid.

Polygonal Masonry

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber6" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" height="207">
<td colspan="2" align="center" width="50%" height="39">
<td class="f" align="center" width="25%" height="39">Delphi,
<td class="f" align="center" width="25%" height="39">Baalbek, Lebanon</td>
<td valign="top" width="25%" height="130"></td>
<td valign="top" width="25%" height="130"></td>
<td valign="top" width="25%" height="130"></td>
<td valign="top" width="25%" height="130"></td>
<td class="f" align="center" valign="top" width="25%" height="16">Fig 6-1</td>
<td class="f" align="center" valign="top" width="25%" height="16">Fig 6-2</td>
<td class="f" align="center" valign="top" width="25%" height="16">Fig 6-3</td>
<td class="f" align="center" valign="top" width="25%" height="16">Fig 6-4</td>

In addition to being exquisitely hewn and fitted, some of the stones were
actually fused together. I have examined the fused joints in the Coricancha in
Cuzco (Fig 6-5, sometimes spelled Koricancha, which in Quechua means "the
corral of gold"), at Ollantaytambo in Peru, inside the Great Pyramid of
Egypt (Fig 6-6) (I was astonished at these joints), and at Delphi in Greece.
Regarding Ollantaytambo Sitchin (1990) writes that the gigantic blocks were
“…carefully raised, put precisely in place, and finally fused together.”

Fused Masonry

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="AutoNumber7" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="400">
<td class="q" align="center" valign="top" width="50%">

Fig 6-5
Coricancha, Peru

<td class="q" align="center" valign="top" width="50%">
Fig 6-6
Great Pyramid, Egypt

Another skill of the master mason was the use of single blocks carved as
corners, in Egypt (Fig 6-7), and Peru, among others (see also Zink, 1979).

Fig 6-7
One-piece corner

So let's speculate about the technique of the master masons. I’m inclined
to think that the shaping and fusing of the polygonal stones might have been
accomplished as follows: Two irregular stones are leaned against each other
(Fig. 6-8a). A high temperature beam (acetylene or electric torch, laser, ion
beam?) is passed back and forth across the contact point A of the stones,
resulting in the first fused joint (b); a third stone is placed on top of the
first two and high temperature shaving is performed at the contact points B and
C (c), resulting in three fused joints (d).

Fig 6-8
Illustrating the joining and fusing of polygonal stones

This scenario of course requires that we accept that the builders of these
ancient, and mostly prehistoric, structures could easily pick up kiloton stones
and place them on top of each other and could produce a beam sufficiently hot to
fuse them together. I think they could.

Desert Artists

"Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled"

– Richard Feynman

"Only within recent years, since the development of universal
communications allowed us to compare the antiquities of our own countries with
those of others, have we been able to see the extent of the vast ruin within
which we all live. If we ignore all alterations to the landscape arising within
the last three thousand years and consider the world as it must have looked in
prehistoric times, the pattern that emerges is one so incompatible with our idea
of civilization that it is easy entirely to miss its significance. For what we
find is this: A great scientific instrument lies sprawled over the entire
surface of the globe. At some period, thousands of years ago, almost every
corner of the world was visited by people with a particular task to accomplish.
With the help of some remarkable power, by which they could cut and raise
enormous blocks of stone, these men created vast astronomical instruments,
circles of erect pillars, pyramids, underground tunnels, cyclopean stone
platforms, all linked together by a network of tracks and alignments, whose
course from horizon to horizon was marked by stones, mounds and

- John Michell(1995)

In 1975 I flew over the Nazca plain in Peru, since the figures and patterns
can only be recognized from the air, along with a small intrepid group of fellow
For me the Nazca lines represent the most persuasive piece of physical
evidence in support of the Ancient Astronaut (AA) hypothesis. Although hundreds
of writers have generated thousands of pages about the lines and figures, I have
not been able to find a sensible explanation of how they were made, or by whom,
or for what purpose. It seems obvious that the lines were made from the air.
They could have been used as landmarks to be seen from space, or perhaps the AA’s
were simply venting their artistic impulse on a convenient giant
"etch-a-sketch"; however what I feel is most likely is that they used
the Nazca plain to test and calibrate the instrument which they used throughout
South America, and perhaps elsewhere on Earth, to delineate "roads"
and radial "ceques" linking important sites. I think that the lines
were probably created by using an instrument which could sweep away shallow
paths of varying widths. I think "the sweeper" was probably something
as simple as a high-pressure water stream operating in much the same way as we
use a garden hose to wash gravel from our driveways. Certainly, with the Nazca
plain bordering on the sea, there would have been a plentiful water supply.
Some of the less precise drawings suggest that the sweeper might have been a
gimbaled device which was guided by hand, similar to the machine-gun mounts on
old bombers; however the great precision of many of the figures suggests that it
more likely was a computerized device which used pre-stored images, such as
modern computer driven routers. For these drawings the aircraft would have had
to hover quite stably.
Here's how I think they were made:

The 2800 foot long "Needle and Thread" drawing (Fig 3-1, adapted
from Discover Magazine, December 2000) begins at the bottom of the figure as a
wide beam; the beam is focused to a line as it moves up the "needle";
the artist then uses a oscillatory motion to delineate the borders of a plateau;
and ends up drawing a spiral, a common motif at ancient sites (perhaps that’s
his signature telling us he is from the galaxy, which also happens to have the
shape of a gigantic spiral!)

Fig 3-1. "Needle and Thread" Image, Nazca, Peru

Although most of the figures were simply outlined with narrow lines, the
variable width feature of the sweeper, as one can also do with the nozzle of a
water hose, permitted the drawing of "filled-in" figures.
The 140 foot long spider (Fig3-2) is one of the best known Nazca figures. The
lines which extend from the rightmost hind leg of the spider establish that the
drawing begins at this point. The entrance line, the parallel line to the right,
started with a broad beam which was focused to a line, and the hindquarters of
the insect were drawn first.

Fig 3-2. The "Spider"

Most of the other animal figures were drawn in this same manner, with an
entrance line, an continuous line sketch of the animal, and an exit line
parallel to the entrance line. In Fig 3-3 the entrance-exit line-pair join the
"hummingbird" at the beak.

Fig 3-3. The "Hummingbird"

The "Trident of Paracas", a 600 ft high drawing over the bay of
Paracas demonstrates that the beam power of the sweeper could be adjusted to
provide a much deeper excavation than was used elsewhere; also the furrows of
the spiral figure at Nazca were reported to be "about a foot deep".
Incidentally the Trident is the largest petroglyph in south America. Zecharia
Sitchin (1990) makes a rather convincing argument that the Trident of Paracas
was the symbol of the Sumerian god Adad, or ISH.KUR ("He of the far
mountains") who was in charge of mining in SA. His other epithet was ZABAR
DIB.BA ("He who bronze obtains and divides")
Apparently the AA’s sweeper helped the Incas create their remarkable 25,000
mile "road" system. Hadingham (1987) relates that "Along the
north coast…several sections of Inca roads run for 25 miles or more with
scarcely any visible deviation. The major coastal artery, in particular, often
ignores minor geographic obstacles, passing straight over rocky hills rather
than curving around them."
For other references on the Nazca lines see Isbella (1978), McIntyre (1978),
Hadingham (1987), Morrison (1988), Von Daniken (1998)
Although the Nazca lines are the most famous, similar lines have been
reported in Bolivia, the USA, Chile, and as "ley" lines in Great
Other huge ground drawings can be found on the 2000 ft high Atacama Desert in
Chili, about 600 mile south of Nazca. The desert is literally covered, for many
miles, with "geo-glyphs". Together they constitute the "zoo of
the Atacama", immense stylized figures.
Traveling another 250 miles south, in the region of Tarapaca province, on a
mountain called Cerro Unitas, we find the "giant", a huge (600 ft)
ground figure with "antennae" radiating from the side and top of it's
head. The drawing "cannot be recognized from the ground since it wraps up
over the crest of the mountain." (Clarke, 1982). This I take to be hard
evidence that these figures were created from the air. It’s location next to
the "lone mountain" also suggests that it was a beacon. It is the
largest known ground drawing of a stylized figure.
Zecharia Sitchin (1980) writes about the 30th parallel, reporting that on
this line lie the Tilmun site and the "sacred cites" of
Giza-Heliopolis (Egypt), Eridu (Mesopotamia), Persepolis (Persia), Harappa
(Indus valley), and Lhasa (Tibet). He further suggests that "Indeed, were
we to study all these sites, all of Earth would probably be encompassed."
The Nazca desert - a testing and calibration site for the devices used to
mark the Earth? by AAs? from the air? I think so!

Articles by William L. Saylor - Main Menu

I. The Ancient Astronauts (AA) Theory Revisited


  • Introduction

  • The AA Hypothesis in Brief

  • Clues and More Clues

  • The Galaxy Has Been Colonized

II. The Gods Meet Men in Prehistory >>>>

  • Polar Shift and the AA Theory

  • Come to Dinner!

III. The Gods as Architects >>>>

  • Pyramids, Platforms, Dolmens and Mounds

    (on this page)

  • The Megalith Builders

    (on this page)

  • The Master Masons

    (on this page)

  • The Desert Artists
    (on this page)

IV. The Technology of the Gods >>>>

  • The Gods and Their Flying Machines

  • Ancient Nuclear Warfare

  • The Biotechnology of the Gods

  • The Immortals

All Articles Copyright 2000-2002 William L. Saylor.

All rights reserved.
Reprinted with Permission.

References, Links and Resources

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="460" height="325">
<td colspan="2" align="middle" valign="top" width="419" height="164">
Related Links

    google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);

  • Baalbeck
  • Human Genome
  • Bible
  • Z. Sitchin
  • Erich von Däniken

  • Many more related links are available from our web site's TOP


  • Cremo, Michael A. and Richard L. Thompson,
    Forbidden Archeology, Govardhan Hill, USA, 1993.

  • Cremo, Michael A., "The Controversy over 'The Mysterious Origins
    of Man'", NEXUS 5/04, 1998; Forbidden Archeology's Impact, Bhaktivedanta Book
    Publishing, USA, 1998, website

  • Doore, Kathy, "The Nazca Spaceport & the Ica Stones of Peru",; see website for copy of Dr Javier
    Cabrera's book, The Message of the Engraved Stones.

  • Doutré, Mark, Ancient Celtic New Zealand, Dé Danann, New Zealand,
    1999, website

  • Milton, Richard,
    Shattering the Myths of Darwinism (original edition: The Facts of Life:
    Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, Corgi, UK, 1993),

  • Steen-McIntyre, Virginia, "Suppressed Evidence for Ancient Man in
    Mexico", NEXUS 5/05, 1998.

  • Sunfellow, David, "The Great Pyramid & The Sphinx", November 25,
    1994, at

  • Tampa Bay Tribune, October 12, 2001 (Darwinism/evolution quote),

  • BOOKS by Erich von Daeniken:

  • Chariots of the Gods

  • Gods from Outer Space

  • The gold of the gods

  • In Search of Ancient Gods : My Pictorial Evidence for the Impossible

  • Miracles of the Gods : A New Look at the Supernatural

  • Von Daniken's Proof

  • Signs of the Gods

  • Pathways to the Gods : The Stones of Kiribati

  • The Gods and Their Grand Design : The Eighth Wonder of the World

  • The Eyes of the Sphinx

  • The Return of the Gods - Evidence of Extraterrestrial Visitations

  • The Arrival of the Gods - Revealing the Alien Landing Sites of Nazca

  • Odyssey of the Gods - An Alien History of Ancient Greece

  • The Gods Were Astronauts: Evidence of the True

<td class="s" align="center" bgcolor="#e2e2e2" valign="top" width="163" height="69">


<td align="left" bgcolor="#e2e2e2" valign="top" width="337" height="69"> <blockquote>


77 Royalty Free
images of the ancient Mayan ruins at Chichen Itza
(one of the most
visited ancient Mayan sites in Mexico).
Each image on the CD is 9 x 6 inches x 300 dpi -- suitable for printing, multimedia and the web.



<td class="s" colspan="2" align="center" bgcolor="#e2e2e2" valign="top" height="69">

The CD includes BONUS material:

  • 3D Model of the pyramid of Kukulkan (El Castillo)
    in two popular formats: Rhino and 3D Studio (also sold

  • 2007 Chichen Itza Calendar (in PDF format)
    This calendar is illustrated with spectacular sepia images
    can be easily printed on your own (also sold separately).


<td colspan="2" width="460" height="95">

<td colspan="2" width="460" height="1">

Back to top Go down
View user profile
All Pyramids Are Not Egyptian
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Egyptian axes

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Egyptian Dreams II :: Ancient Egypt :: Pyramids, Tombs, & Monuments-
Jump to: